From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12982 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 07:12:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12974 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 07:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 07:12:36 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2L74tl10290; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 02:04:55 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2L7CWQ07606; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 02:12:33 -0500 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2L7CW518163; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:12:32 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2L7AFl07806; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:10:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:46:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Message-ID: <20030321071015.GA7800@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Ulrich Weigand , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com References: <20030320223021.GJ2006@redhat.com> <200303210115.CAA19377@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303210115.CAA19377@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01341.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:15:36AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Well, but we don't need the size in bits when computing stack > alignment. True. Perhaps you can find out why we're doing this? > I'll just fix the MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD define to get 128-bit > libgcc2 routines built. This is good as well. r~