From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-70859-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3091 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 08:27:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3072 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 08:27:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sirius.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.139)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 08:27:35 -0000
Received: from sirius.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by sirius.codesourcery.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2O8TBuZ003004;
	Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:29:11 -0800
Received: (from mitchell@localhost)
	by sirius.codesourcery.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2O8TA5I003000;
	Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:29:10 -0800
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:15:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200303240829.h2O8TA5I003000@sirius.codesourcery.com>
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: dje@watson.ibm.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: PR optimization/9745
Reply-to: mark@codesourcery.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01442.txt.bz2


David --

I think your proposed path to PR 9745:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00549.html

is safe, and as sensible as anything I can think of.

Please apply to the branch and the mainline.  If people find this
pessimizes code unduly, we can try to come up with a safe way to do
what the original code was trying to do.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com