From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23091 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 22:42:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23080 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 22:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (204.176.21.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 22:42:34 -0000 Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2RMfsQ32403; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:41:54 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:47:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Casey Leedom Cc: dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu, mark@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, dan@dberlin.org, jh@suse.cz, rth@cygnus.com Subject: Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Message-ID: <20030327144154.A32394@synopsys.com> References: <20030327213542.64941.qmail@web13108.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030327213542.64941.qmail@web13108.mail.yahoo.com>; from casey_leedom@yahoo.com on Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:35:42PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01684.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:35:42PM -0800, Casey Leedom wrote: > I'm trying to track down a patch for what appears to be a g++ 3.3 > optimization bug with the SPEC2000 252.eon benchmark. When I compile this > "-m32 -O0" or "-m64 -O3" I get correct results. But if I use anything other > than -O0 with -m32 I end up with incorrect results. Is anyone aware of this > bug and is there a patch available for it? Thanks! You don't mention a platform, but since you mention -m64 I guess sparc. Right? Also, is there a PR for this?