From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15673 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2003 15:46:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15666 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2003 15:46:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2003 15:46:35 -0000 Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338) id 1F739F2CEA; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 10:46:35 -0500 (EST) To: charlet@ACT-Europe.FR, guerby@acm.org Subject: Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Cc: bosch@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Message-Id: <20030330154635.1F739F2CEA@nile.gnat.com> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:14:00 -0000 From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01781.txt.bz2 > Do you mean that it's okay for people to submit integration > patches from the published sources? I have 5.00a as an ACT customer, > should I start from there? 5.00a is 3.2 based, and is not exactly current. The cvs sources are really the (not necessarily fully working, on a day to day basis) bleeding edge development sources, so it is better to wait to submit integration patches based on this cvs tree as soon as it is up (should be this coming week).