From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17087 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 18:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17080 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2003 18:59:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 18:59:32 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2VIpRl30446; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:51:27 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2VIxTQ19646; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:59:29 -0500 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2VIxS503806; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:59:28 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2VIv9e25690; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:57:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:02:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Nathanael Nerode Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: review process Message-ID: <20030331185709.GA25684@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Nathanael Nerode , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <3E888CC5.1010807@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E888CC5.1010807@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01818.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:45:25PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I was certainly under the impression that we were also dropping 3-line > patches on the floor. It's not the size of the patch, but the (perceved) amount of analysis required to validate it. r~