From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5558 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2003 06:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5539 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 06:45:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desire.geoffk.org) (12.235.88.42) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 06:45:35 -0000 Received: (from geoffk@localhost) by desire.geoffk.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h336j6v03615; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:45:06 -0800 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 08:04:00 -0000 From: Geoff Keating Message-Id: <200304030645.h336j6v03615@desire.geoffk.org> To: ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <200304030824.40493.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> (message from Eric Botcazou on Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:24:40 +0200) Subject: Re: PCH support on Solaris References: <200304021934.12278.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200304030317.h333HFB03519@desire.geoffk.org> <200304030824.40493.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 > From: Eric Botcazou > Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:24:40 +0200 > > I think we discussed this more in the PR and the suggestion was to use > > MAP_FIXED but to check that the area was safe to map into. There's > > sample code in the PR, I think, but it really needs someone with a > > Solaris machine to do a proper patch using host-hooks. > > This particular PR contains no discussion and no sample code. And I didn't > find anything either in the other 6 PCH-related PRs reported by GNATS. > > Could you point me to the discussion you are speaking of? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-02/msg01348.html I don't know why that didn't get into the PR. -- - Geoffrey Keating