From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29632 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2003 06:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29615 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 06:24:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 06:24:26 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.79.198) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.026) id 3E8A4CE700036239; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:24:26 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eric Botcazou To: Geoff Keating Subject: Re: PCH support on Solaris Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 07:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200304021934.12278.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200304030317.h333HFB03519@desire.geoffk.org> In-Reply-To: <200304030317.h333HFB03519@desire.geoffk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200304030824.40493.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 > I think we discussed this more in the PR and the suggestion was to use > MAP_FIXED but to check that the area was safe to map into. There's > sample code in the PR, I think, but it really needs someone with a > Solaris machine to do a proper patch using host-hooks. This particular PR contains no discussion and no sample code. And I didn't find anything either in the other 6 PCH-related PRs reported by GNATS. Could you point me to the discussion you are speaking of? -- Eric Botcazou