* tree-ssa bug?
@ 2003-04-03 13:26 Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 14:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 16:27 ` Diego Novillo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Lebedinsky @ 2003-04-03 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: list, gcc, Eigler, Frank Ch.
Built off CVS branch tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
Linux 2.4, i386
OK, here is another very strange result, took me a bit of time to track
this one down.
-------------------------------------------
#!/bin/sh
cat >zz.c <<EOF
#include <stdio.h>
#define XXX 2147483647
int main ()
{
unsigned long count = 8;
if (count > XXX)
fprintf (stderr, "wow!\n");
return (0);
}
EOF
/usr/local/gcc-mudflap/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-3.5-tree-ssa -fmudflap
\
-Wall -o zz zz.c
./zz
-------------------------------------------
The reult is:
wow!
Looks like a bug to me. Same result when the constant is
0x7fffffff
or
0x7fffffffUL
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: tree-ssa bug?
2003-04-03 13:26 tree-ssa bug? Eyal Lebedinsky
@ 2003-04-03 14:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 16:27 ` Diego Novillo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Lebedinsky @ 2003-04-03 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: list, gcc, Eigler, Frank Ch.
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>
> Built off CVS branch tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
> Linux 2.4, i386
>
> OK, here is another very strange result, took me a bit of time to track
> this one down.
> ...
> /usr/local/gcc-mudflap/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-3.5-tree-ssa -fmudflap \
> -Wall -o zz zz.c
I should say that the -fmudflap is not related to the problem which
shows without it too.
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: tree-ssa bug?
2003-04-03 13:26 tree-ssa bug? Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 14:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
@ 2003-04-03 16:27 ` Diego Novillo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Diego Novillo @ 2003-04-03 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eyal Lebedinsky; +Cc: gcc
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> Built off CVS branch tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
> Linux 2.4, i386
>
> OK, here is another very strange result, took me a bit of time to track
> this one down.
>
Good catch. This was an omission in the new non destructive
folders. When folding comparisons with signed_max+1 we were
always replacing the comparison with >=.
Diego.
* fold-const.c (fold_relational_hi_lo): Add missing comparison when
folding comparisons to signed_max+1.
Index: fold-const.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c,v
retrieving revision 1.213.2.25
diff -d -u -p -r1.213.2.25 fold-const.c
--- fold-const.c 27 Feb 2003 18:30:02 -0000 1.213.2.25
+++ fold-const.c 3 Apr 2003 14:14:41 -0000
@@ -4983,7 +4983,7 @@ fold_relational_hi_lo (code_p, type_p, o
st0 = (*lang_hooks.types.signed_type) (TREE_TYPE (op0));
st1 = (*lang_hooks.types.signed_type) (TREE_TYPE (op1));
- exp = build (LE_EXPR ? GE_EXPR: LT_EXPR,
+ exp = build (code == LE_EXPR ? GE_EXPR: LT_EXPR,
type,
convert (st0, op0),
convert (st1, integer_zero_node));
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-03 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-03 13:26 tree-ssa bug? Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 14:18 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-04-03 16:27 ` Diego Novillo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).