From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32282 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 15:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32259 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 15:17:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 15:17:11 -0000 Received: from tornado.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:yHVdblwHL8GEuFXrVdHj2B9gYchQb03o@tornado.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.228]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h38FH8u18116 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:17:08 -0400 Received: from tornado.toronto.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h38FH3U4008267 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:17:05 -0400 Received: (from dnovillo@localhost) by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h38FH3Cw008265 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:17:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 16:39:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge Message-ID: <20030408151702.GA8216@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> References: <200304081426.h38EQbFU009186@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <1049813508.24852.18.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049813508.24852.18.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: Red Hat Canada X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 10:26, law@redhat.com wrote: > > > I would object very strongly as it would make trying to track down the > > existing C++ issues extremely difficult. Please please please do not > > check in the merge. > > > Oops. Too late ;) > > OK, not a problem. In that case, the diff for the merge can be found at > > http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/pub/20030408-tree-ssa-mainline-merge.diff.gz > > If anyone has time, I'll appreciate help in fixing these problems. > > Thanks. Diego. > Hmm, my message seems to have been confusing. Just to clarify, I did *not* check-in the merge. I will only check it in after all the regressions have been fixed. Diego.