From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-71606-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28796 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 07:55:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28789 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 07:55:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2003 07:55:42 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (212.83.141.178) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.026)
        id 3E8A4CE60013BBCA; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:05:47 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Reload bug
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 08:57:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <200304081937.16859.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20030408212528.GC11492@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20030408212528.GC11492@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200304090804.30147.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2

> No, it is valid for high parts too as long as the register is possible
> (imagine the xmm being replaced by eax).

Did I forget to say that this example is bogus? The logic doesn't of course 
trigger for %eax so we don't pessimize anything in that case.

-- 
Eric Botcazou