From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16957 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 20:24:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16932 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 20:24:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (12.150.115.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2003 20:24:32 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h39KO5h2022978; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:24:05 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h39KO35Z022976; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:24:03 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 21:23:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Reload bug Message-ID: <20030409202403.GF22822@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Jan Hubicka , Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200304081937.16859.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200304090909.30614.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20030409091345.GG9102@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200304091144.41119.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20030409165023.GC23694@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030409165023.GC23694@kam.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00393.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 06:50:23PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > For 3.2 it is probably OK to simply revert the patch > after all. I can do so if maintainer approves that. Please do. r~