From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9337 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2003 16:40:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9315 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 16:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 16:40:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3AGe5e22136; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:40:05 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3AGd4W09637; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:39:04 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3AGd3530860; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:39:03 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3AGagk04267; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:36:42 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:06:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT Message-ID: <20030410163641.GA4261@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Ulrich Weigand , kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <200304100040.CAA24017@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <200304101527.RAA07154@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304101527.RAA07154@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:27:49PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > This means that when compiling the C source that references > the variables, I do not know that they are in fact 1-byte > aligned. Do you think the backend should be able to cope > with even this scenario, or would you consider this a > frontend bug? I would consider this an Ada bug. r~