From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14751 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2003 23:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14736 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 23:53:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 23:53:17 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3ANhnZ06602; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:43:49 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3ANrGW20633; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:53:16 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3ANrG527928; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:53:16 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3ANotR04438; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:50:55 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:31:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Richard Kenner Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT Message-ID: <20030410235055.GI4350@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <10304102235.AA03771@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10304102235.AA03771@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:35:54PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > I definitely think there's a bug in that the Ada front end sets > DECL_USER_ALIGN for these objects and the C front end (in response to > the auto-generated files) does not. That mis-match should be > addressed in some way -- either by not setting DECL_USER_ALIGN in Ada > > But it *isn't* set in Ada! Ulrich's experience clearly belies this. r~