From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-71792-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18831 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2003 10:48:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18823 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 10:48:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 10:48:15 -0000
Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525)
	id DC68722A029; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:48:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:57:00 -0000
From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>
To: Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
Message-ID: <20030411124809.C24876@dublin.int.act-europe.fr>
References: <10304102149.AA03328@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20030410220624.GE4350@redhat.com> <1050057861.4038.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <1050057861.4038.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from guerby@acm.org on Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:44:22PM +0200
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2

> Question to ACT: is "gnatbind -C" here for other than historical reasons
> (supporting previous gnatbind without the feature to generate Ada)?

Yes, it is also there to detect and work around cases where the Ada and the C
compiler won't handle main files identically (e.g. special handling of
the "main" function, ...).

Arno