From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-71808-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20043 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2003 16:41:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20021 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 16:41:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 16:41:48 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id A3394F2E22; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: guerby@acm.org, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
Message-Id: <20030411164147.A3394F2E22@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:59:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2

> Question to ACT: is "gnatbind -C" here for other than historical reasons
> (supporting previous gnatbind without the feature to generate Ada)?

Not at all, there are many reasons why people find it convenient to generate
a main program in C rather than Ada. This is a feature that is quite widely
used, and we certainly intend to keep supporting it.