From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8894 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2003 00:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8813 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 00:52:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2003 00:52:27 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3M0qPD14071; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:52:25 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3M0qPq05846; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:52:25 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3M0qPZ04584; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:52:25 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3M0qO830610; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:52:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200304220052.h3M0qO830610@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu CC: pcarlini@unitus.it, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <200304220041.UAA22116@caip.rutgers.edu> (ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu) Subject: Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3? References: <3EA44576.90708@unitus.it> <200304220041.UAA22116@caip.rutgers.edu> X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01027.txt.bz2 > But, on the upside we won't need vasprintf.c, and the resulting code > will probably be faster than the current implementation if we cache > the fd. File I/O is very expensive on Microsoft platforms (DJGPP, Cygwin, MinGW) compared to what you're used to under Unix platforms, even to /dev/null (both djgpp and cygwin emulate /dev/null, I don't know about mingw).