From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18051 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 21:45:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17989 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 21:45:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (12.150.115.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 21:45:23 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3NLhwNm031881; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:43:58 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h3NLhwcF031879; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:43:58 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:33:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, aj@suse.de Subject: Re: Profiling on S390 Message-ID: <20030423214358.GD24723@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Jan Hubicka , Ulrich Weigand , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, aj@suse.de References: <20030422211923.GE21400@redhat.com> <20030423074537.GG15464@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030423174829.GD21871@redhat.com> <20030423185015.GA4751@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20030423193215.GA24723@redhat.com> <20030423195701.GD4751@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030423195701.GD4751@kam.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01192.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:57:01PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > What do you think if I re-continued patches that > direction? (moving GCSE to code hoisting beasts, later doing pre-GCSE > liveness pass and even later making GCSE to actually use it and update) It'd be nice to have this completed. It'll need testing on a wide selection of targets before it can go in though. r~