From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4085 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2003 00:09:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4066 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2003 00:09:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2003 00:09:43 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3ONxfZ14714; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:59:41 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3P08fW27269; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:08:41 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3P08eM23018; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:08:40 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3P06GF22453; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:06:16 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 02:56:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Jason Merrill Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT Message-ID: <20030425000615.GE22386@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Jason Merrill , Alexandre Oliva , Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek References: <10304230111.AA11080@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01262.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:30:44AM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote: > Does this make sense to everyone? Yes. So long as we rename these flags to avoid confusion. r~