From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-73670-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4717 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 22:04:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4709 invoked from network); 8 May 2003 22:04:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (12.150.115.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2003 22:04:22 -0000
Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h48M1wNm007001;
	Thu, 8 May 2003 15:01:58 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h48M1vPi006999;
	Thu, 8 May 2003 15:01:57 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:04:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Biggs <xyzzy@hotpop.com>
Cc: GCC list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Local binding DECLs
Message-ID: <20030508220157.GE6901@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Biggs <xyzzy@hotpop.com>, GCC list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <1052394173.13089.7.camel@steve.softier.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1052394173.13089.7.camel@steve.softier.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00842.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:42:47PM +0300, Stephen Biggs wrote:
> Is this even possible at this stage?

No.


r~