From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-73896-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5078 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 01:15:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5008 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 01:15:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 01:15:54 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4C15CZ05777;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 21:05:12 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4C1FrT19768;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 21:15:53 -0400
Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4C1FrM08369;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 18:15:53 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4C1DOD15797;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 18:13:24 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 01:15:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Biggs <xyzzy@hotpop.com>
Cc: GCC list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Local binding DECLs
Message-ID: <20030512011324.GA15787@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Biggs <xyzzy@hotpop.com>, GCC list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <1052394173.13089.7.camel@steve.softier.local> <20030508220157.GE6901@redhat.com> <1052636662.18831.1.camel@steve.softier.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1052636662.18831.1.camel@steve.softier.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01068.txt.bz2

On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:04:20AM +0300, Stephen Biggs wrote:
> Ok... is there ANY way to find out if the FUNCTION_DECL I am handed at
> any time (preferably in ENCODE_SECTION) is declared in a function block
> as opposed to globally?

*Declared*?  I.e. to distinguish

	extern void foo();
	void bar() { foo(); }

from 

	void bar() {
	  extern void foo();
	  foo();
	}

Absolutely not.  That question doesn't even make sense.


r~