From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74056-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8469 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 20:15:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8415 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 20:15:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 20:15:45 -0000
Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4CKD5Nm007464;
	Mon, 12 May 2003 13:13:05 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h4CKD59X007462;
	Mon, 12 May 2003 13:13:05 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:15:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: law@redhat.com
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, jh@suse.cz, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
Message-ID: <20030512201305.GB7445@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, law@redhat.com,
	Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, jh@suse.cz,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <10305100225.AA20837@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200305121736.h4CHa8CZ016317@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200305121736.h4CHa8CZ016317@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01228.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:36:08AM -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
> I believe Richard Henderson outlined those in a message to
> the GCC lists sometime in the last couple months.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg00763.html


r~