public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: law@redhat.com
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
	Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305131802.h4DI25Ea012586@speedy.slc.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "13 May 2003 13:50:41 EDT." <1052848240.27232.407.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

In message <1052848240.27232.407.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo
 writes:
 >On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 13:38, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >
 >> Does this look better? :-)
 >> 
 >Much :)
 >
 >Now, if we could also get rid of those pesky labels.  You mentioned
 >something about that, but I forget what.
Well, it's simply a matter of building a use count for the labels.  As
we remove GOTO_EXPRs we decrement the count.  If the count goes to zero
and the label is not special (such as the target of a nonlocal goto), then
the label is unused and can be eliminated.

There's nothing particularly tricky here except that we want to build
those use counts efficiently.  Meaning we don't want a separate walk
over the tree structures merely to build the use counts.

It's on the TODO, but it hasn't bubbled up to the top yet.  Removal
of unused variables is a much bigger win as far as compilation time
is concerned.



Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-13 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-13  0:26 Zack Weinberg
2003-05-13  0:48 ` Dale Johannesen
2003-05-13  1:30   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-05-13  9:30 ` Michael Matz
2003-05-13 16:17   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-05-13 16:30     ` Diego Novillo
2003-05-13 16:40       ` Zack Weinberg
2003-05-13 17:07         ` Diego Novillo
2003-05-13 17:16           ` law
2003-05-13 17:24             ` Diego Novillo
2003-05-13 17:36           ` Zack Weinberg
2003-05-13 17:38           ` law
2003-05-13 17:50             ` Diego Novillo
2003-05-13 18:02               ` law [this message]
2003-05-13 18:35                 ` Joe Buck
2003-05-13 19:35           ` [tree-ssa] Improve eliminate_useless_stmts_and_vars [Was Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns? ] law
2003-05-13 22:14   ` Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns? Richard Henderson
2003-05-14  9:25     ` Michael Matz
2003-05-14 11:34 Naveen Sharma, Noida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305131802.h4DI25Ea012586@speedy.slc.redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=dnovillo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).