From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9257 invoked by alias); 18 May 2003 19:35:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9214 invoked from network); 18 May 2003 19:35:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk) (213.152.55.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 May 2003 19:35:17 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19HTsH-0005V8-00; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:31:13 +0100 Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 19:36:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment? Message-ID: <20030518193113.GC13596@daikokuya.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01707.txt.bz2 Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:- > is extracted from Herb's GTW #86 -- full message appended below. > I would suggest we warn for trigraphs in comments. I changed this particular case a few weeks ago. In general I think warning about trigraphs in comments is a bad idea. This particular case I was of course always aware of, but considered it obscure. 3.4 documentation and behaviour is already good enough for you I think. The patch is not appropriate for 3.3. The real fix is to remove trigraphs from the standard. Neil.