Webpage not valid html

Webpage not valid html

[Hanno Böck]

although you have the w3c-logo on gcc.gnu.org, it is not valid html.

PATCH for Re: Webpage not valid html

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Mon, 19 May 2003, Hanno [ISO-8859-15] Böck wrote:
> although you have the w3c-logo on gcc.gnu.org, it is not valid html.

Indeed, <dl> got lost as part of the GCC 3.3 update. Fixed thusly:

  Fix markup. Minor changes to make future updates simpler.

Gerald

Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.372
diff -u -3 -p -r1.372 index.html
--- index.html	14 May 2003 23:25:53 -0000	1.372
+++ index.html	19 May 2003 08:29:57 -0000
@@ -32,20 +32,18 @@ suite and automated regression testers</
 as <a href="benchmarks/">various benchmark suites and automated testers</a>
 to maintain and improve quality.</p>

+<dl>

 <!-- NOTE: Of the following four items, we always want to show exactly
-     three - either the first, second, and fourth, or the second, third,
+     three - either items 1, 2 and 4 or items 2, 3 and 4.
      and fourth.
 -->

 <!--
-<dl>
 <dt><strong>Active release branch:</strong>
-  will become <a href="gcc-3.3/index.html">GCC 3.3</a>
+  will become <a href="gcc-3.4/index.html">GCC 3.4</a>
 </dt><dd>
-  Prerelease Stage; non-documentation changes require
-  <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg01430.html">approval by
-  the release manager</a>.
+  Bug fixes only.
 </dd>
 -->

@@ -68,6 +66,7 @@ to maintain and improve quality.</p>
   <a href="develop.html#stage1">Stage 1</a>;
   open for all maintainers.
 </dd>
+
 </dl>

 <hr />

Re: Webpage not valid html

[Janis Johnson]

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:27:31AM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> although you have the w3c-logo on gcc.gnu.org, it is not valid html.

Which page isn't valid?  We usually test them when making changes, but
occasionally bugs slip in.

Janis

Re: Webpage not valid html

[Janis Johnson]

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:52:09AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:27:31AM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > although you have the w3c-logo on gcc.gnu.org, it is not valid html.
> 
> Which page isn't valid?  We usually test them when making changes, but
> occasionally bugs slip in.

Never mind, I see that Gerald has already fixed it.

Janis