From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74609-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15673 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 18:07:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15609 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 18:07:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (204.176.21.194)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2003 18:07:28 -0000
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4JI55T06660;
	Mon, 19 May 2003 11:05:05 -0700
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 18:11:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>, zack@codesourcery.com,
   neil@daikokuya.co.uk, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
Message-ID: <20030519110505.B6565@synopsys.com>
References: <m34r3sxw7j.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030518193113.GC13596@daikokuya.co.uk> <m3n0hjxwgo.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <16072.55751.300819.237661@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> <871xyvf1pu.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <16072.60344.109869.222568@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> <m33cjbuhbp.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <m33cjbuhbp.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>; from gdr@integrable-solutions.net on Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:44:26PM +0200
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01780.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:44:26PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> What is happening with current GCC in production use is that GCC
> choosed NOT to warn for trigraphs in comment even if -Wtrigraph. 

Ideally GCC should not warn about trigraphs in comments, ever, unless that
trigraph can change the meaning of the program.