Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

[Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>]

I wrote:
> >>So, suppose we start a web page with Joel's categories as headings, and
> >>then let people fill in sections for instructions in places where they
> >>know the answer?  We'll wind up with missing sections, but at least we'll
> >>have something to point people to.

Michael S.Zick wrote:
> > Perhaps establishing a Wiki would be the answer here.
> > It is such a diverse subject (cross-building) with many people having just
> > the bits and pieces that work for them; it sounds like an ideal subject for
> > a Wiki.

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 05:08:43PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Like, say, the one at http://billgatliff.com/twiki/bin/view/Crossgcc/WebHome ?
> (though I don't much like wikis, and that one's a bit out of date...)
> 
> For what it's worth, over on the crossgcc mailing list, we're trying
> to update Bill Gatliff's toolchain build script.
> See also http://www.embeddedtux.org/pipermail/etux/2003-May/000018.html

I don't object to wikis, but I'd prefer to wind up with an organized
document, that would document a flow that we'd then try to keep working
(at least for the common cases).