From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74722-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23144 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 18:59:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23077 invoked from network); 20 May 2003 18:59:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 May 2003 18:59:21 -0000
Received: from webmail.ott.qnx.com (webmail.ott.qnx.com [192.168.2.3])
	by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28271;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 14:55:19 -0400
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by webmail.ott.qnx.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id h4KHpHT08965;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 13:51:17 -0400
Message-Id: <200305201751.h4KHpHT08965@webmail.ott.qnx.com>
To: "Joe Buck" <jbuck@synopsys.com>, <gp@qnx.com>
Subject:  Re: libsupc++,  _cxa  references, and Dinkum libcpp
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:37:00 -0000
From: <gp@qnx.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030520113743.A15089@synopsys.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01893.txt.bz2



Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> said:

> 
> It appears that you continue to confuse libsupc++ and libstdc++.  The
> former is a tiny library, the latter is a big library.  The compiler alone
> will generate code that requires only the former.

Ok.  Thanks.

> > So to clarify my understanding, the __cxa symbols being emitted by cc1plus
> > are part of the C++ standard, and are missing from Dinkumware, yes?

Sorry, I mispoke/mistyped.  I meant ABI, not standard.  
 
> Your problem appears to be that Dinkumware wants to provide its own version
> of some things that libsupc++ provides.  So, you'll have to hack one or the
> other.

Yes, you are right.  I was wrong.  I will chase this from my end with Dinkumware.

As I said, always willing to be corrected.  :-)

Thanks again.
GP