From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24676 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 03:27:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24669 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 03:27:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2003 03:27:40 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4L3ReH23751 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:40 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4L3ReI22822 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:40 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-10.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.10]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4L3Reo27879 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:40 -0400 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id C688E6BCA2; Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 03:33:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: MinGW (Was Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets) Message-ID: <20030521032726.GB24962@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20030520011613.GA629@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030520011613.GA629@doctormoo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01918.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:16:13PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >Patches not getting reviewed in a reasonable amount of time is a known >problem, and we're all working on it. :-/ Patches that are submitted for mingw which are covered by the parts of gcc that I maintain are reviewed in a reasonable amount of time. Patches in other parts of the tree get reviewed as fast as any other patches get reviewed, AFAICT. Sometimes mingw/cygwin *bugs* in gnats languish however. I do what I can. I haven't seen anyone around who was willing to step in to handle cygwin/mingw issues. cgf (windows, cygwin, mingw maintainer)