From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74876-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23437 invoked by alias); 23 May 2003 00:59:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23410 invoked from network); 23 May 2003 00:59:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2003 00:59:42 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57])
	by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h4N0xW139512;
	Thu, 22 May 2003 20:59:32 -0400
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144] (may be forged))
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.0/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h4N0xW8769972;
	Thu, 22 May 2003 20:59:32 -0400
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/09-18-2002) with ESMTP id UAA27450;
	Thu, 22 May 2003 20:59:32 -0400
Message-Id: <200305230059.UAA27450@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>
cc: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
   law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: speedup collect2 (by not using it) 
In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Austern <austern@apple.com> 
   of "Thu, 22 May 2003 15:31:05 PDT." <132E6AB0-8CA5-11D7-AC1D-00039390D9E0@apple.com> 
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 02:46:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02047.txt.bz2

>>>>> Matt Austern writes:

Matt> But in any case, isn't this a bit tangential to the question Mike
Matt> asked?  He asked what happens on systems where USE_COLLECT2
Matt> *isn't* defined, and you're talking about systems where it is (or at 
Matt> least was) defined.

	Mike asked about AIX and systems with ctor requirements like AIX.
Those system define use_collect2=yes.

David