* Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
@ 2003-05-23 16:53 Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 21:17 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-05-23 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: dberlin
Daniel Berlin said:
>No, i'll take care of it.
> If it makes any of you feel better about getting spammed on gcc-bugs,
>realize i get copies of all mail failures (since there is no
>unassigned@gcc.gnu.org, that's at least one for every change to an
>unassigned bug).
Good GOD. How do you MANAGE?
--Nathanael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
2003-05-23 16:53 Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-) Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-05-23 21:17 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-23 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 12:19 PM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Berlin said:
>
>> No, i'll take care of it.
>> If it makes any of you feel better about getting spammed on gcc-bugs,
>> realize i get copies of all mail failures (since there is no
>> unassigned@gcc.gnu.org, that's at least one for every change to an
>> unassigned bug).
>
> Good GOD. How do you MANAGE?
It all gets thrown in a separate mailbox, which i look at a few times a
day to make sure nothing really bad is going on.
I'm 23 (24 on June 9th), so i'm young still and have lots of energy,
unlike all you old geezers.
:)
--Dan
>
> --Nathanael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
@ 2003-05-23 6:40 Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 14:35 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-05-23 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dberlin, gcc
The Bugzilla sanity check pops up with the following errors, which need
to be fixed by somebody with user-editing rights. Daniel?
---
Bad value 0 found in cc.bug_id
Bad value 5422 found in bugs.reporter (bug 9639)
Bad value 5422 found in longdescs.who (bug 9639)
Bad profile email address, id=88, <@bugs.debian.org>.
Bad profile email address, id=3389,
<=?iso-8859-1?q?christian_j=f6nsson?=>.
Bad profile email address, id=4362, <cpopetz>.
Bad profile email address, id=5544, <"bradley c. kuszmaul">.
Bad profile email address, id=3918, <"catenazzi, giacomo amabile">.
Bad profile email address, id=2694,
<=?iso-8859-1?q?=22gard=2c_torbj=f6rn=22?=>.
Bad profile email address, id=3045, <pthomas>.
Bad profile email address, id=5955, <=?iso-8859-1?q?beno=eet_sibaud?=>.
Bad profile email address, id=79, <@ifrance.com>.
Bad profile email address, id=4142, <crash>.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
2003-05-23 6:40 Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-05-23 14:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 15:50 ` Nathanael Nerode
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-23 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 02:20 AM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> The Bugzilla sanity check pops up with the following errors, which need
> to be fixed by somebody with user-editing rights. Daniel?
>
This number of errors is normal for a large installation.
Don't worry about it.
Removing the email addresses is not necessarily trivial, since they
must be somewhere in some bugs, or it never would have picked them up
in the first place.
> ---
> Bad value 0 found in cc.bug_id
>
>
> Bad value 5422 found in bugs.reporter (bug 9639)
>
>
> Bad value 5422 found in longdescs.who (bug 9639)
> Bad profile email address, id=88, <@bugs.debian.org>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=3389,
> <=?iso-8859-1?q?christian_j=f6nsson?=>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=4362, <cpopetz>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=5544, <"bradley c. kuszmaul">.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=3918, <"catenazzi, giacomo amabile">.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=2694,
> <=?iso-8859-1?q?=22gard=2c_torbj=f6rn=22?=>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=3045, <pthomas>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=5955, <=?iso-8859-1?q?beno=eet_sibaud?=>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=79, <@ifrance.com>.
>
> Bad profile email address, id=4142, <crash>.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
2003-05-23 14:35 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-05-23 15:50 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 16:19 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-05-23 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: gcc
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 02:20 AM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> The Bugzilla sanity check pops up with the following errors, which need
>> to be fixed by somebody with user-editing rights. Daniel?
>>
>
> This number of errors is normal for a large installation.
> Don't worry about it.
> Removing the email addresses is not necessarily trivial, since they must
> be somewhere in some bugs, or it never would have picked them up in the
> first place.
If you try to edit one of the bugs with the bogus addresses, the 'red
screen' pops up. Shall I send one to you?
--Nathanael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
2003-05-23 15:50 ` Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-05-23 16:19 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-23 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 11:47 AM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 02:20 AM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>> The Bugzilla sanity check pops up with the following errors, which
>>> need
>>> to be fixed by somebody with user-editing rights. Daniel?
>>>
>> This number of errors is normal for a large installation.
>> Don't worry about it.
>> Removing the email addresses is not necessarily trivial, since they
>> must be somewhere in some bugs, or it never would have picked them up
>> in the first place.
>
> If you try to edit one of the bugs with the bogus addresses, the 'red
> screen' pops up. Shall I send one to you?
No, i'll take care of it.
If it makes any of you feel better about getting spammed on gcc-bugs,
realize i get copies of all mail failures (since there is no
unassigned@gcc.gnu.org, that's at least one for every change to an
unassigned bug).
:)
>
> --Nathanael
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-23 20:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-23 16:53 Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-) Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 21:17 ` Daniel Berlin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-23 6:40 Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 14:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 15:50 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 16:19 ` Daniel Berlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).