From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: dberlin@dberlin.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 19:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305231906.h4NJ66v14510@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98AB1BCE-8D39-11D7-B31E-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> (message from Daniel Berlin on Fri, 23 May 2003 12:14:14 -0400)
Just my two cents and IMHO, but...
There should be one state that means "the developer thinks it's fixed"
and one just after it that means "the originator agrees." I don't
like the idea of the originator closing bug reports without
confirmation from the originator. I.e. the developer does verified
and resolved, but the originator moves resolved cases to closed.
There should be one closed state that means "closed without fixing
anything" and one that means "fixed".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-23 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-23 15:29 Volker Reichelt
2003-05-23 16:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 19:23 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 19:37 ` DJ Delorie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-23 14:55 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 7:39 Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 8:55 ` Giovanni Bajo
2003-05-23 9:36 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2003-05-23 10:19 ` Giovanni Bajo
2003-05-23 14:18 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 15:47 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 19:23 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 19:46 ` DJ Delorie
2003-05-23 19:56 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 20:03 ` DJ Delorie
2003-05-23 20:14 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305230908020.22023-100000@gandalf.ices.utex as.edu>
2003-05-23 14:19 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2003-05-23 15:41 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 15:33 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-05-23 9:43 ` Joseph S. Myers
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305231035220.4682@kern.srcf.societies.cam.a c.uk>
2003-05-23 9:53 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2003-05-23 15:05 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 15:54 ` Nathanael Nerode
[not found] <20030523062858.322.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
2003-05-23 6:59 ` Giovanni Bajo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305231906.h4NJ66v14510@greed.delorie.com \
--to=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).