Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:02:36PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > A few suggestions for the mail to gcc-bugs, taking this recent
> > message as an example:
> >
> >  > PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> >
> > Can't this be automated?
> Actually, it can't, AFAIK.

Well, there's already a Reply-To: header set...

> >  > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10942
> >
> > Maybe show the short URL here?
> Sure, i guess.
> 
> 
> >
> >  > ------- Additional Comments From edmar@motorola.com  2003-05-22 17:30 -------
> >  > Created an attachment (id=4054)
> >  >  --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4054&action=view)
> >  > Preprocessed file that caused the ICE
> >
> > Although I really like not getting any useless 500kB+ emails
> > through gcc-bugs anymore, if an attachment is short, can it
> > be sent in the actual email please?
> 
> Define short.

Let's just pick a reasonable limit - how about 20K?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer