From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27298 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 14:59:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27291 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 14:59:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 14:59:36 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19JaV7-0006QN-00; Sat, 24 May 2003 10:00:01 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19JaUW-000439-00; Sat, 24 May 2003 10:59:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 15:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Segher Boessenkool , gcc Subject: Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs Message-ID: <20030524145923.GA15538@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin , Segher Boessenkool , gcc References: <20030524022356.GA7386@nevyn.them.org> <557D9182-8D93-11D7-AC8F-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <557D9182-8D93-11D7-AC8F-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02194.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:56:36PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 10:23 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:02:36PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > >> > >> > >>On Sat, 24 May 2003, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>A few suggestions for the mail to gcc-bugs, taking this recent > >>>message as an example: > >>> > >>>>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* > >>>>gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. > >>> > >>>Can't this be automated? > >>Actually, it can't, AFAIK. > > > >Well, there's already a Reply-To: header set... > >> > Yes, but i can't automate people doing the right thing. > I can, however, remove the banner, and already planned on it. > > >>> > >>>>------- Additional Comments From edmar@motorola.com 2003-05-22 > >>>>17:30 ------- > >>>>Created an attachment (id=4054) > >>>> --> > >>>>(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4054&action=view) > >>>>Preprocessed file that caused the ICE > >>> > >>>Although I really like not getting any useless 500kB+ emails > >>>through gcc-bugs anymore, if an attachment is short, can it > >>>be sent in the actual email please? > >> > >>Define short. > > > >Let's just pick a reasonable limit - how about 20K? > > Actually, let's not do it. > It's not easy to do, it's cpu consuming (attachments are stored > compressed in the db, so i'd have to uncompress the attachments every > time we go to send out mail, just to see if they are the right size) > first, and second, it's a security risk (auto-distribute hacks by > posting them as an attachment). Can you query the compressed size more quickly? We don't need to be precise here... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer