From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7025 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2003 23:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6961 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2003 23:11:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2003 23:11:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5CNB6T14362; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:11:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200306122311.h5CNB6T14362@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: green@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org, joern.rennecke@superh.com, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Unreviewed patch In-Reply-To: Your message of "12 Jun 2003 08:15:20 -0600" <87u1av8jrb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87u1av8jrb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:19:00 -0000 From: kaz Kojima X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg01101.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: > As you've discovered, libffi is a bit under maintained. I'm not > really the person to do it -- I'd do little more than rubber stamp > patches that come in. I'm happy to do that, though, in the absence of > a better process. Hopefully some more qualified person out there will > speak up (and we'll end up with a libffi entry in MAINTAINERS). > > I believe we've agreed in the past that port maintainers can make > port-specific libffi changes. So I think you can check in your fix on > that basis. I'd like to check my patch in. Thanks. I totally agree with your and Anthony's suggestion about the approvement for libffi changes, though in this specific case I hesitate over because sh64-linux is for the SHmedia processor with a new and very different ISA from the other SH family and I'm rather new to SHmedia. So I thought and still think that it would be nice if SHmedia experts see my patch. BTW, libjava works to some extent with the sjlj configuration using this libffi port. I'll report it to the java list. Regards, kaz