From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20318 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20303 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.37.55) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.026) id 3F0A7975001A2419; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:04:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eric Botcazou To: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Rainer Orth , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <16133.30814.486754.373909@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <200307150851.02373.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20030716193420.GA9863@disaster.jaj.com> In-Reply-To: <20030716193420.GA9863@disaster.jaj.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200307162209.05224.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01266.txt.bz2 > If this passes "make doc", and I see no reason why it wouldn't, I agree > that this should go in 3.3 and trunk. Maybe can we put it only on the branch in light of... > Not with current sources, no. Now that this has come up, I'll keep my > eye out for such problems, and will periodically try building using the > POSIX tools, just to check. ...that? -- Eric Botcazou