From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-80639-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22846 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2003 02:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22746 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 02:20:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (198.182.56.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 02:20:10 -0000
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h762JNF02032;
	Tue, 5 Aug 2003 19:19:23 -0700
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 02:47:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>,
   Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, aph@redhat.com,
   coyote@coyotegulch.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: On inlining in C++
Message-ID: <20030805191923.A2019@synopsys.com>
References: <20030805190007.A1778@synopsys.com> <CB8E63B8-C7B3-11D7-B015-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <CB8E63B8-C7B3-11D7-B015-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>; from pinskia@physics.uc.edu on Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:15:05PM -0400
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2


> > Ah, but even if we fix the inlining issues, we still aren't keeping the
> > promise: inline functions are still slower in many cases if 
> > struct/class
> > objects with more than one member are passed by reference.

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:15:05PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>   (but that macro is not equivalent to that function).

Yes, you can nitpick it, but the effect is real.