From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-80693-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12730 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2003 16:35:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12723 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 16:35:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (198.182.56.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 16:35:22 -0000
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h76GYmO05820;
	Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:48 -0700
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:51:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: mrs@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Subject: Re: On inlining in C++
Message-ID: <20030806093448.A5809@synopsys.com>
References: <20030806030112.7D289F2DC1@nile.gnat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030806030112.7D289F2DC1@nile.gnat.com>; from dewar@gnat.com on Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:01:12PM -0400
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:01:12PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > excessive lookahead (call comes before the
> > definition)
> 
> This actually seems like a pretty serious limitation to me ...

Given that we can't inline mutually recursive functions, it is always
possible to fix the order so that things work, though it can be a pain
in the ass.