From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15150 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2003 16:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15135 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 16:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO piper.synopsys.com) (198.182.56.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 16:37:52 -0000 Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h76Gbhu05839; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:37:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:58:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Message-ID: <20030806093743.B5809@synopsys.com> References: <200308031612.h73GCSQq005684@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <5EAA1F02-C5F9-11D7-8E11-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> <20030804093551.B24974@synopsys.com> <003701c35b01$ad73fae0$1e1eab83@minax> <20030805184117.E27614@synopsys.com> <1060184828.941.9.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1060184828.941.9.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:47:07AM -0700 X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:47:07AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 18:41, Joe Buck wrote: > > In any case, for every rule there's an exception: what if we discover, > > after the release, that some open bug was actually fixed in 3.3.1? Why > > *not* set the target milestone to 3.3.1 and add it to the list of fixed > > bugs? > > I suppose that makes sense. It's a little confusing, in that a bugzilla > query done after the fact will show up different results than the one > you used to generate the release notes, Right, but I would then correct the gcc-3.x/changes.html page on the web to compensate. > If you think we needn't do anything here, that's good enough for me. I don't think that we need to do anything here. We might want to revisit the issue five or six releases down the road, when the growing choice list for target-milestone becomes inconvenient. But at least for now, let's just leave it.