From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 940 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2003 13:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 914 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 13:26:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.18.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2003 13:26:34 -0000 Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107]) by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 28BCD4DF26; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:26:36 +0200 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:41:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Jan Hubicka , Andreas Schwab , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 Message-ID: <20030909132636.GA24264@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20030906230104.GA5623@lucon.org> <20030906231316.GC12333@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030909000521.GM12333@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030909052132.GA4617@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030909052132.GA4617@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 > I can bootstrap gcc mainline with this patch on Linux/ia64 now. But I > got new failures: > > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000120-2.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-1.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-1.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-1.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-1.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c (test for excess errors) This testcase triggers ill defined behaviour and probably should be turned into hard error, unfortunately I still don't know how to do that without breaking glibc yet. I will take look on the 20000120-2.c and install the patch as obvious. Thanks! Honza