* Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] @ 2003-10-03 14:23 Bradley Lucier 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-10 20:35 ` Bradley Lucier 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-03 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc, libstdc++; +Cc: Bradley Lucier Just a note that there were several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on 3.4 mainline from yesterday afternoon on sparc and sparc64; full test results are at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00119.html Brad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 14:23 Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-03 15:42 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-10 20:35 ` Bradley Lucier 1 sibling, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-03 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bradley Lucier; +Cc: gcc, libstdc++ > Just a note that there were several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test > failures on 3.4 mainline from yesterday afternoon on sparc and sparc64; > full test results are at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00119.html Everything was as usual just hours before: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00117.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00116.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00115.html -- Eric Botcazou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler ` (2 more replies) 2003-10-03 15:42 ` Bradley Lucier 1 sibling, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-10-03 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: lucier, gcc, libstdc++ Can you tell me if this stil happens with current CVS sources? Also, does libstdc++ build? thanks, benjamin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-03 17:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-10-04 3:56 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-09 16:04 ` Eric Botcazou 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-03 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: gcc, libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > Can you tell me if this stil happens with current CVS sources? Also, > does libstdc++ build? I started a build this morning on darwin, linuxppc, sol9 and hppa-linux. Darwin, linuxppc are ok. Sol9 and hppa suffer these failures. Now I synced libstdc++ again on sol9 and build. I think results will be available in a few minutes. But I'd say it will be the same. And yes, libstdc++ will build. Affected are g++, libstdc++ and I think also libgcj? Andreas, BTW, Benjamin, for further details #gcc irc.oftc.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-03 17:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-10-03 18:03 ` Andreas Tobler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2003-10-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Tobler; +Cc: Benjamin Kosnik, gcc, libstdc++ Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch> writes: | BTW, Benjamin, for further details #gcc irc.oftc.net I would be highly desirable if discussions on such details about GCC and its components happened on GCC lists so that they can be archived for future references. -- Gaby ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 17:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2003-10-03 18:03 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-03 21:32 ` Zack Weinberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-03 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gabriel Dos Reis; +Cc: Benjamin Kosnik, gcc, libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch> writes: > > | BTW, Benjamin, for further details #gcc irc.oftc.net > > I would be highly desirable if discussions on such details about > GCC and its components happened on GCC lists so that they can be > archived for future references. No worry, I certainly will post my investigations on the LISTS. At the moment I binary search the offending patch which introduced the failures. As it seems it is a libstdc++-v3 issue and not a front end thingy. It takes a few minutes until I have it. Sorry for mentioning irc. Just thought for faster tracking the failure some online hints would help. Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 18:03 ` Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-03 21:32 ` Zack Weinberg 2003-10-03 21:47 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Zack Weinberg @ 2003-10-03 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Tobler; +Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis, Benjamin Kosnik, gcc, libstdc++ Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch> writes: > > Sorry for mentioning irc. Just thought for faster tracking the failure > some online hints would help. I don't think anyone should apologize for mentioning irc. The channel has been a valuable resource for quick communication between developers, and its use should be encouraged. However, perhaps it would be a good idea to have logs of channel traffic posted somewhere. Other free-software projects that use IRC for developer discussion do this. zw ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 21:32 ` Zack Weinberg @ 2003-10-03 21:47 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2003-10-03 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zack Weinberg; +Cc: Andreas Tobler, Benjamin Kosnik, gcc, libstdc++ "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes: | Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch> writes: | | > | > Sorry for mentioning irc. Just thought for faster tracking the failure | > some online hints would help. | | I don't think anyone should apologize for mentioning irc. The channel | has been a valuable resource for quick communication between | developers, and its use should be encouraged. FWIW, nobody has been discouraging use of IRC for communication between developpers. My remark was very specific. -- Gaby ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-04 3:56 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-09 16:04 ` Eric Botcazou 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-04 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Bradley Lucier, Eric Botcazou, gcc, libstdc++ On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 10:40 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > Can you tell me if this stil happens with current CVS sources? Yes > Also, does libstdc++ build? Yes. Final results in a few hours. Brad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-04 3:56 ` Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-09 16:04 ` Eric Botcazou 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-09 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: lucier, gcc, libstdc++ > Can you tell me if this stil happens with current CVS sources? Also, > does libstdc++ build? This is still present as of today (Thu Oct 9 04:48:45 UTC 2003) on Solaris 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 but not 2.5.1. Here is for example a GDB session for: FAIL: g++.dg/expr/enum1.C execution test Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __atomic_add(int volatile*, int) (__mem=0x0, __val=1) at /opt/build/eric/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/include/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bits/atomicity.h:122 122 *__mem += __val; (gdb) where #0 __atomic_add(int volatile*, int) (__mem=0x0, __val=1) at /opt/build/eric/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/include/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bits/atomicity.h:122 #1 0xff2e3678 in std::ios_base::Init::Init() (this=0xff35b95c) at /opt/build/eric/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/include/streambuf:437 #2 0xff2e16a0 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) ( __initialize_p=-13256356, __priority=0) at /opt/build/eric/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/include/iostream:77 (gdb) Everything is fine on Thu Oct 2 03:49:53 UTC 2003. -- Eric Botcazou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-10-03 15:42 ` Bradley Lucier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-03 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: Bradley Lucier, gcc, libstdc++ On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 09:53 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> Just a note that there were several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test >> failures on 3.4 mainline from yesterday afternoon on sparc and >> sparc64; >> full test results are at >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00119.html > > Everything was as usual just hours before: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00117.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00116.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00115.html You updated a few hours later (I should have given the update time in GMT); I'll try it again now. Expect esults in about 14 1/2 hours :-(. Thanks. Brad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-03 14:23 Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-10 20:35 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-11 6:38 ` Eric Botcazou 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bradley Lucier; +Cc: gcc, libstdc++ It seems that the g++ errors disappeared yesterday, but many of the libstdc++ ones remain: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00446.html Brad On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 09:22 AM, Bradley Lucier wrote: > Just a note that there were several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test > failures on 3.4 mainline from yesterday afternoon on sparc and > sparc64; full test results are at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00119.html > > Brad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-10 20:35 ` Bradley Lucier @ 2003-10-11 6:38 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-11 6:44 ` Andreas Tobler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-11 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bradley Lucier; +Cc: gcc, libstdc++ > It seems that the g++ errors disappeared yesterday, but many of the > libstdc++ ones remain: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00446.html The C++ errors have not totally disappeared: on 10/02, I had 7 unexpected C++ failures while there are still 42 unexpected failures according to your report. I don't think we have recovered from the disastrous change yet. -- Eric Botcazou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-11 6:38 ` Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-11 6:44 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-11 10:11 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-13 17:08 ` Benjamin Kosnik 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-11 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Botcazou, Bradley Lucier; +Cc: gcc, libstdc++ Eric Botcazou wrote: >>It seems that the g++ errors disappeared yesterday, but many of the >>libstdc++ ones remain: >> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00446.html > > > The C++ errors have not totally disappeared: on 10/02, I had 7 unexpected C++ > failures while there are still 42 unexpected failures according to your > report. I don't think we have recovered from the disastrous change yet. > With the patchlet we (mostly Pétur) found, the situation improves: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00450.html See also the follow up thread from this one. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-10/msg00170.html and back. Still awaiting comments. Andreas RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/locale.cc,v retrieving revision 1.95 diff -u -r1.95 locale.cc --- src/locale.cc 2 Oct 2003 23:06:13 -0000 1.95 +++ src/locale.cc 9 Oct 2003 18:37:34 -0000 @@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ #ifdef __GTHREADS if (__gthread_active_p()) __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once); - else #endif { if (!_S_classic) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-11 6:44 ` Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-11 10:11 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-11 10:19 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-13 17:08 ` Benjamin Kosnik 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-11 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Tobler; +Cc: Bradley Lucier, gcc, libstdc++ > With the patchlet we (mostly Pétur) found, the situation improves: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00450.html It's far better, indeed. > See also the follow up thread from this one. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-10/msg00170.html > and back. Thanks for your effort in sorting this out! -- Eric Botcazou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-11 10:11 ` Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-11 10:19 ` Andreas Tobler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-11 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: Bradley Lucier, gcc, libstdc++ Eric Botcazou wrote: >>With the patchlet we (mostly Pétur) found, the situation improves: >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00450.html > > > It's far better, indeed. I have a multilib test running which shows better. I post as it finished. > > >>See also the follow up thread from this one. >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-10/msg00170.html >>and back. > > > Thanks for your effort in sorting this out! It was mostly learning for me, but quite useful. Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-11 6:44 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-11 10:11 ` Eric Botcazou @ 2003-10-13 17:08 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-13 17:34 ` Andreas Tobler 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-10-13 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Tobler; +Cc: ebotcazou, lucier, gcc, libstdc++ So, what is the status of this patch? If it's to be something like this, can you do a ChangeLog entry? thanks, benjamin Index: src/locale.cc =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/locale.cc,v retrieving revision 1.96 diff -c -p -r1.96 locale.cc *** src/locale.cc 9 Oct 2003 21:17:11 -0000 1.96 --- src/locale.cc 13 Oct 2003 15:01:03 -0000 *************** namespace std *** 395,406 **** #ifdef __GTHREADS if (__gthread_active_p()) __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once); - else #endif ! { ! if (!_S_classic) ! _S_initialize_once(); ! } } void --- 395,403 ---- #ifdef __GTHREADS if (__gthread_active_p()) __gthread_once(&_S_once, _S_initialize_once); #endif ! if (!_S_classic) ! _S_initialize_once(); } void ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] 2003-10-13 17:08 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-10-13 17:34 ` Andreas Tobler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andreas Tobler @ 2003-10-13 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Pétur Runólfsson, gcc, libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > > > So, what is the status of this patch? If it's to be something like this, > can you do a ChangeLog entry? Ah!? Certainly can I write a ChangeLog entry, if this IS the solution. But what do I write? Workaround for a solaris bug? Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-13 16:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-10-03 14:23 Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier 2003-10-03 14:51 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-03 15:41 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-03 16:00 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-03 17:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-10-03 18:03 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-03 21:32 ` Zack Weinberg 2003-10-03 21:47 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-10-04 3:56 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-09 16:04 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-03 15:42 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-10 20:35 ` Bradley Lucier 2003-10-11 6:38 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-11 6:44 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-11 10:11 ` Eric Botcazou 2003-10-11 10:19 ` Andreas Tobler 2003-10-13 17:08 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2003-10-13 17:34 ` Andreas Tobler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).