From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25371 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2003 21:53:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25363 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 21:53:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.alinoe.com) (62.195.88.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 21:53:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29846 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2003 21:53:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 21:53:00 -0000 From: Carlo Wood To: Richard Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, wilson@specifixinc.com, jason@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Message-ID: <20031006215315.GA29799@alinoe.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, wilson@specifixinc.com, jason@redhat.com References: <20030922001710.GA24248@alinoe.com> <20030927124920.GA16447@alinoe.com> <20031006174054.GC17794@redhat.com> <20031006190817.GA9460@alinoe.com> <20031006201102.GA5019@redhat.com> <20031006201423.GA10085@nevyn.them.org> <20031006202057.GB5019@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031006202057.GB5019@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:20:57PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > Please name such a place. I'm asking for specifics here and > getting nothing from yall. get_callee_fndecl is one. It says: if (TREE_CODE (call) != CALL_EXPR) abort (); ... it did abort. > Have yall *tried* WFL yes > and have experimental evidence for how much > of a performance hit you get? I never said it would be a performance hit, the whole WFL is just a ugly "solution" that isn't used much yet; when using it more it will cause exceptions all over the code. I'll write the patch nevertheless, then you can see what I mean. -- Carlo Wood