From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11979 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2003 00:46:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11971 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 00:46:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 00:46:48 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h970kl2m005405; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:46:48 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h970klrv005403; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:46:47 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:46:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, wilson@specifixinc.com, jason@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Message-ID: <20031007004647.GA5397@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, wilson@specifixinc.com, jason@redhat.com References: <20031006201102.GA5019@redhat.com> <20031006201423.GA10085@nevyn.them.org> <20031006202057.GB5019@redhat.com> <20031006215315.GA29799@alinoe.com> <20031006215536.GB9757@redhat.com> <20031006223034.GA31753@alinoe.com> <20031006231706.GB4839@redhat.com> <20031006234940.GA3134@alinoe.com> <20031007000703.GD4839@redhat.com> <20031007004305.GA8485@alinoe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007004305.GA8485@alinoe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:43:05AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: > Oh. Then where would be a better place? build_cxx_call, for one. *After* propagating nothrow info. r~