public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Hornby <alex@anvil.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031009124208.GA31838@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031009103608.GQ12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:36:08PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:33:00AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:43:22AM +0100, Alex Hornby wrote:
> > > 
> > > Does the new DWARF2 call frame in gdb 6.0 support mean programs compiled 
> > > with GCC and -fomit-frame-pointer can now be debugged? That would be 
> > > great as -fomit-frame-pointer provides quite a performance boost on x86.
> > > 
> > > Assuming this is possible, what GCC and binutils versions would be 
> > > needed to take advantage of this?
> > 
> > In general yes.  Backtraces should work.  Ultra-accurate argument and
> > local variable printing requires -fvar-tracking in GCC so it's a little
> > flaky now, but unwinding should be fine.
> > 
> > Anything recent.  I think 3.2, 3.3 are fine.
> 
> Even without CFI info? With the exception of IA-64/AMD64, GCC doesn't
> generate unwind info by default, only when -fasynchronous-unwind-tables.

Sorry, unstated assumption.  This only works if you build with
debugging information.  GDB parses both .eh_frame and .debug_frame, and
all the necessary CFI should be in .debug_frame with -gdwarf-2.

If debugging info bothers you, use objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink :)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-09 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-09  9:51 Alex Hornby
2003-10-09 12:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-09 12:42   ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-10-09 12:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-10-09 18:00       ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031009124208.GA31838@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=alex@anvil.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).