public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>,
	gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031016102113.C2389@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u8r81ezaf6.fsf@gromit.moeb>; from aj@suse.de on Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:18:53PM +0200


Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> writes:
> > Now that I'm ready to publish Acovea (Analysis of Compiler Options Via
> > Evolutionary Algorithm), I'm wondering which version of gcc I should
> > analyze.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:18:53PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 3.4 is soon in feature freeze, so it's too late for major changes.

Right, but if Scott should discover that, say, a different combination of
-f options in -O2 would be significantly better, it seems that this would
be a low-risk change that still could be accepted.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-16 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-15 16:26 Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-15 18:09 ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-10-15 19:34   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-16 15:58   ` Gerald Pfeifer
2003-10-16 16:20     ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-18 14:12       ` Gerald Pfeifer
2003-10-16 18:04   ` Joe Buck [this message]
2003-10-17 11:48 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-10-17 12:52   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-17 18:48 Matthew Fago
2003-10-18 11:17 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-18 12:10   ` Matt Fago
2003-10-18 16:16     ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-21  0:04       ` tm_gccmail
2003-10-21  6:47         ` Scott Robert Ladd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031016102113.C2389@synopsys.com \
    --to=jbuck@synopsys.com \
    --cc=aj@suse.de \
    --cc=coyote@coyotegulch.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).