public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, "Branko Èibej" <brane@xbc.nu>,
	eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU, bje@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031205104251.A2650@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y8trm9ra.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>; from zack@codesourcery.com on Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:53:29AM -0800

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:53:29AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >
> > Are you saying that config.guess is widely used outside of configure
> > scripts?
> 
> Yes.

config.guess is used in a number of places to generate the canonical name
for the type of system that the user is running on.

As an example of such use, consider GCC's test_summary script.  This
script processes the results of a dejagnu test run and mails in a report.
GCC testers use this script regularly so that regressions can be tracked.
These reports go to gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org and are archived on the web.
It uses config.guess to fill in the type of system for which tests are
being run.

That said, for many uses of the output of config.guess, a change would not
cause significant harm.  This is especially true for source distributions
that contain their own copy of config.guess: the distribution will generally
be consistent with the copy of config.guess that it contains.


> zw

-- 
Q. What's more of a headache than a bug in a compiler.
A. Bugs in six compilers.  -- Mark Johnson

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-05 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-20 12:25 Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 14:03 ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 14:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 18:29 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 20:31   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 20:35     ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 20:50       ` Albert Chin-A-Young
2003-11-20 21:32       ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 21:44         ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-21  0:57           ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-21  1:15             ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-23 12:51             ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-23 23:40               ` Branko Čibej
2003-11-24  8:17                 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24  8:28                   ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 12:08                     ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24 14:35                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 21:54                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-25 10:47                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-25 23:12                             ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-26  6:05                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-26 12:05                               ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-27  1:58                                 ` Russ Allbery
2003-11-25 10:07                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-26  3:49                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-20 21:33     ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 21:40       ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 23:32         ` Phil Edwards
2003-11-21 23:56 ` tm_gccmail
2003-11-22  0:01   ` Joe Buck
2003-11-27 18:55 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-29  1:42   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-29  2:24     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-01 21:29       ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-01 22:09         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 21:40           ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-02 21:45             ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 22:21               ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-03 17:22               ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-03 17:23                 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-03 17:33                   ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04  7:42                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04  8:57                     ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-05 17:27                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-05 18:43                         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 18:53                           ` Joe Buck [this message]
2003-12-06 12:11                             ` Nix
2003-12-07 23:22                         ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-04 10:16                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 11:16                       ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 21:41                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-04 22:07                           ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:04                           ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 23:11                           ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-04 23:27                             ` Joe Buck
2003-12-04 23:38                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:41                                 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 23:42                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 11:46                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06  7:05                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-06 20:41                                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 21:56                                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07  9:25                                             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-07 15:26                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 19:25                                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05  5:00                                   ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-05 12:37                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-08 13:29                             ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 22:44                               ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-08 23:48                                 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 23:59                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-10  0:04                                   ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-12  5:30                                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-12  7:19                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-12 21:27                                     ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-05 23:22                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04 14:22                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-20 21:55 bkorb
2003-11-20 23:24 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 23:52   ` Bruce Korb
2003-12-02 22:58 Wolfgang Bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031205104251.A2650@synopsys.com \
    --to=jbuck@synopsys.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=bje@wasabisystems.com \
    --cc=brane@xbc.nu \
    --cc=eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).