From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25903 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2003 05:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25885 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 05:20:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 05:20:17 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.54.192) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.033) id 3FCEE101002B5794; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:19:56 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eric Botcazou To: Alexandre Oliva Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 07:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: "Zack Weinberg" , Ben Elliston , Joe Buck , Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <871xroqlaf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87vfownoam.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200312060622.46431.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 > Should we care about those who have guessed wrong? I think it would > be ok for us to report *-sun-solaris10 for Solaris 10 and above. What if Sun's marketing department renames Solaris 11 into Solaris G3? -- Eric Botcazou