From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11304 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2003 11:02:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11293 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 11:02:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 11:02:40 -0000 Received: by dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id 5090F229E60; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:02:39 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:07:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Arnaud Charlet , Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Ada testsuite Message-ID: <20031208120238.B10394@dublin.act-europe.fr> References: <200312081137.37121.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20031208114241.A28096@dublin.act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jsm@polyomino.org.uk on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:51:54AM +0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00506.txt.bz2 > > Well, that's certainly surprising, since check-ada is not part of check-gcc, > > but only part of make check. > > make check-gcc at toplevel runs make check in the gcc directory. I see. I guess the check-ada rule could check whether RUNTESTFLAGS is non null and do nothing if this is the case. Arno