From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13040 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 20:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13028 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 20:26:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 20:26:11 -0000 Received: from [195.113.18.106] (helo=nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ATolF-0007yS-09 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:47:13 -0500 Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107]) by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id BEDA94DED0; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:42:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 20:31:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Diego Novillo Cc: Steven Bosscher , Jeff Law , Jan Hubicka , Zdenek Dvorak , Richard Henderson , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled. Message-ID: <20031209194237.GD7849@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <1070993097.8617.10.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1070993097.8617.10.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 > > Folks, > > One of these patches is exposing new regressions in the g++ and > libstdc++ testsuites (at least not in x86-64, the others are still > churning). > > I haven't been able to see which one. Could you help me out and see if > it's not due to your patch? I'm not getting these failures in > enabled-checking testers. This is exactly the same latent problem as exposed by the tail call patch. This time it reproduces without bootstrapping on unoptimized compiler, so we have realistic chance to debug it out. Honza