From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15386 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 00:22:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15369 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 00:22:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost2.tudelft.nl) (130.161.180.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 00:22:49 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rav.antivirus (Postfix) with SMTP id C91AF17894; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:22:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from listserv.tudelft.nl (listserv.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.33]) by mailhost2.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC0117891; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:22:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (hekje1.shuis.tudelft.nl [145.94.192.78]) by listserv.tudelft.nl (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0D0MmQP008316; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:22:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2FB7995C97; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:25:28 +0100 (CET) From: Steven Bosscher To: Daniel Jacobowitz , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <20040113000554.GB599@nevyn.them.org> <20040113001648.GA5201@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040113001648.GA5201@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130125.28098.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00752.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:16, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Speaking just for myself, watching var-tracking not get reviewed > repeatedly was a really depressing experience, since the patch > motivated me to finish GDB support for the new debugging information. > It's going to be a real user-visible quality-of-experience improvement > when it goes in. The longer Stage 3 drags on, the longer you have to > use a SuSE (?) vendor compiler to get it. Yes. Most of the RTL-opt branch is in SUSE's 3.3.3. It is also on the hammer branch for everyone else. Gentoo and Mandrake use the hammer branch, simply because it beats the FSF release on all turf. I still hope debian switches too, it would be a good choice I think. Gr. Steven