From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-88891-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14252 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2004 01:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14235 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 01:35:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vaxjo.synopsys.com) (198.182.60.75)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 01:35:58 -0000
Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23])
	by vaxjo.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 263D9DAA6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from piper.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA10699;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
	by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i0E1Zpu23211;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:35:51 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: piper.synopsys.com: jbuck set sender to Joe.Buck@synopsys.com using -f
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:36:00 -0000
From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>,
	Geoff Keating <geoffk@apple.com>,
	Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
Message-ID: <20040113173551.A23134@synopsys.com>
References: <202ADE61-461E-11D8-8072-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <4B65790D-4620-11D8-BCF6-003065A77310@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <4B65790D-4620-11D8-BCF6-003065A77310@apple.com>; from mrs@apple.com on Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:29:12PM -0800
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00846.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:29:12PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> Along these lines, I'd like to see C++ about 4x faster.  I'd be happy 
> with 2x faster[1], anything less, well, isn't interesting.  I'd like 
> for the SC to find and appoint such a person to tackle speed problems.

Want the job? :-)

I would like C++ to be at least 2x faster too, but wanting it and making
it happen are two different things.  It's not like there is a paid
position available.